+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs GPT-4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 leads with 18.6% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
1 year newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:56.8%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:75.3%(+18.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:56.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:75.3%(+18.6%)
Providers:2