+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs GPT-4o mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o mini leads with 23.5% higher average benchmark score. Overall, GPT-4o mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
10 months newer
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:51.7%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:75.2%(+23.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
1 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:51.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:75.2%(+23.5%)
Providers:1