+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs GPT-5 nano
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-5 nano leads with 62.5% higher average benchmark score. GPT-5 nano is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-5 nano is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 Nano was developed as the most compact variant in the GPT-5 family, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments and edge computing scenarios. Built to bring next-generation AI capabilities to devices and applications where latency and efficiency are paramount, it distills GPT-5 innovations into a minimal footprint.
2 months newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
GPT-5 nano
OpenAI
2025-08-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:15.8%
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Average Score:78.2%(+62.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5 nano
2024-05-30
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
2 providers
OpenAI
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:15.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Avg Score:78.2%(+62.5%)
Providers:2