+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs GPT OSS 120B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT OSS 120B leads with 42.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports multimodal inputs. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, GPT OSS 120B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-OSS 120B was developed as an open-source model release from OpenAI, designed to provide the research and developer community with access to a capable language model. Built with 120 billion parameters, it enables experimentation, fine-tuning, and deployment in contexts where open-source licensing and transparency are valued.
2 months newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:42.4%
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Average Score:85.0%(+42.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
5 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:42.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Avg Score:85.0%(+42.6%)
Providers:5