+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Granite 3.3 8B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Base leads with 8.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Granite 3.3 8B Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base was developed by IBM as an enterprise-focused foundation model, designed to provide a reliable starting point for business applications. Built with 8 billion parameters and trained on curated data, it serves as a foundation for domain-specific customization in enterprise contexts.
1 month newer
Granite 3.3 8B Base
IBM
2025-04-16
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:59.5%
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Average Score:67.8%(+8.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Base
2024-04-01
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:59.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Avg Score:67.8%(+8.3%)
Providers:0