+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Grok-3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 leads with 70.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Grok-3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 was introduced as xAI's third-generation flagship model, designed to push the boundaries of reasoning, factual accuracy, and helpful assistance. Built to advance the state of AI capabilities, it incorporates improvements across language understanding, generation, and analytical thinking.
3 months newer
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:14.9%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:85.8%(+70.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
Grok-3
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
1 providers
xAI
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:14.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:85.8%(+70.9%)
Providers:1