+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Kimi K2 Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Base leads with 26.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base was created as the foundation model in the K2 series, designed to serve as a starting point for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide strong base capabilities for domain-specific applications, it enables developers to build specialized solutions on Moonshot's architecture.
1 month newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:46.6%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:72.5%(+26.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:46.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:72.5%(+26.0%)
Providers:0