+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 35.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports multimodal inputs. o1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
5 months newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:51.1%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:86.8%(+35.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:51.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:86.8%(+35.7%)
Providers:2