+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-mini leads with 28.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports multimodal inputs. o1-mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini was created as a faster, more cost-effective reasoning model, designed to bring extended thinking capabilities to applications with tighter latency and budget constraints. Built to excel particularly in coding and STEM reasoning while maintaining affordability, it provides a more accessible entry point to reasoning-enhanced AI assistance.
8 months newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:50.5%
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:79.2%(+28.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:50.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:79.2%(+28.7%)
Providers:2