+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs o1-pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-pro leads with 54.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, o1-pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-pro was developed as an enhanced version of the o1 reasoning model, designed to provide extended reasoning capabilities with greater depth and reliability. Built for professionals and advanced users tackling complex analytical tasks, it offers enhanced thinking time and reasoning quality for the most demanding applications.
5 months newer
o1-pro
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:24.8%
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Average Score:79.0%(+54.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o1-pro
2023-09-30
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:24.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Avg Score:79.0%(+54.2%)
Providers:0