+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads with 20.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 14B was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability and efficiency for diverse language tasks. Built with 14 billion parameters, it provides strong performance for applications requiring reliable instruction-following without the resource demands of larger models.
8 months newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:50.0%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:70.3%(+20.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:50.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:70.3%(+20.3%)
Providers:0