+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed leads with 8.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
Launched on the same date
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:33.7%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:42.0%(+8.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:33.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:42.0%(+8.3%)
Providers:1