+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview leads with 6.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
1 month newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:34.4%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:41.0%(+6.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:34.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:41.0%(+6.6%)
Providers:0