+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo leads with 5.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. GPT-3.5 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-3.5 Turbo is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
2 years newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:51.1%
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:56.2%(+5.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:51.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:56.2%(+5.1%)
Providers:2