+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs GPT-4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 leads with 12.5% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. Notable strengths include HumanEval (66.5%), MMLU (60.1%), Global-MMLU-Lite (59.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 77.7% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2 Reasoning Challenge (ARC) (96.3%), HellaSwag (95.3%), Uniform Bar Exam (90.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly.
2 years newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 26 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:23.3%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:35.9%(+12.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:23.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:35.9%(+12.5%)
Providers:2