+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs GPT-4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 leads with 14.8% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4 is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
2 years newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:51.1%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:65.9%(+14.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:51.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:65.9%(+14.8%)
Providers:2