+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs GPT-4.1 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 mini leads with 33.7% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4.1, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to serve applications where speed and cost are priorities while maintaining solid performance, it extends the GPT-4.1 capabilities to resource-conscious deployments.
2 months newer
GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:30.5%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Average Score:64.2%(+33.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 mini
2024-05-31
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
2 providers
OpenAI
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:30.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Avg Score:64.2%(+33.7%)
Providers:2