+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs GPT-4.1 nano
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 nano leads with 22.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, GPT-4.1 nano is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
2 months newer
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:42.4%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Average Score:65.2%(+22.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
1 providers
OpenAI
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:42.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Avg Score:65.2%(+22.8%)
Providers:1