+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs GPT-4o mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o mini leads with 23.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, GPT-4o mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
11 months newer
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:51.1%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:74.1%(+23.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
1 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:51.1%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:74.1%(+23.0%)
Providers:1