+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview leads with 8.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was introduced as an experimental ultra-compact model, designed to demonstrate IBM's progress in efficient model development. Built to explore the boundaries of what small models can achieve for enterprise applications, it represents an early look at next-generation Granite capabilities.
1 month newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:63.3%
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:71.4%(+8.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:63.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:71.4%(+8.1%)
Providers:0