+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Grok-2 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 mini leads with 25.7% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Grok-2 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 Mini was created as a more efficient variant of Grok 2, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make Grok 2's advancements accessible to applications with tighter resource constraints, it balances performance with practical deployment needs.
10 months newer
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:48.0%
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:73.7%(+25.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:48.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:73.7%(+25.7%)
Providers:0