+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Jamba 1.5 Large
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Jamba 1.5 Large leads with 15.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Jamba 1.5 Large is available on 2 providers. Overall, Jamba 1.5 Large is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large was developed by AI21 Labs using a hybrid architecture combining transformer and state space models, designed to provide efficient long-context understanding. Built to handle extended documents and conversations with computational efficiency, it represents AI21's innovation in efficient large-scale model design.
10 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Large
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:41.8%
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Average Score:57.2%(+15.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Large
2024-03-05
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput:
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:41.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Avg Score:57.2%(+15.4%)
Providers:2