+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Kimi K2 Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Base leads with 26.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base was created as the foundation model in the K2 series, designed to serve as a starting point for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide strong base capabilities for domain-specific applications, it enables developers to build specialized solutions on Moonshot's architecture.
15 days newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:41.8%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:68.4%(+26.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:41.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:68.4%(+26.6%)
Providers:0