+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Kimi K2 Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 38.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
15 days newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:39.7%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:77.7%(+38.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:39.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:77.7%(+38.0%)
Providers:1