+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct leads with 27.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B was developed as Meta's largest open-source language model, designed to provide frontier-level capabilities with 405 billion parameters. Built to demonstrate that open-source models can match proprietary systems in capability, it enables researchers and developers to experiment with and deploy a powerful foundation model without licensing restrictions.
11 months newer
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:48.0%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Average Score:75.1%(+27.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
8 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:48.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Avg Score:75.1%(+27.1%)
Providers:8