+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Medium leads with 47.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Magistral Medium is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium was introduced as a specialized model for advanced reasoning and analytical tasks, designed to handle complex problem-solving scenarios. Built to serve enterprise and professional applications requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Mistral's focus on high-quality analytical capabilities.
16 days newer
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:14.9%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:62.0%(+47.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:14.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:62.0%(+47.1%)
Providers:0