+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Magistral Small 2506
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Small 2506 leads with 45.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Magistral Small 2506 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Small was created as an efficient reasoning-focused variant, designed to bring analytical capabilities to applications with tighter resource constraints. Built to balance problem-solving depth with practical deployment needs, it extends reasoning-enhanced AI to broader use cases.
16 days newer
Magistral Small 2506
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:14.9%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Average Score:60.7%(+45.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
Magistral Small 2506
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:14.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Avg Score:60.7%(+45.8%)
Providers:0