+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Base leads with 14.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Mistral Small 3 24B Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Base was developed as a 24-billion-parameter foundation model, designed to serve as a base for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide a strong starting point for domain-specific applications, it represents an intermediate-scale option in Mistral's model lineup.
4 months newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:45.5%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Average Score:59.8%(+14.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
2023-10-01
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:45.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Avg Score:59.8%(+14.3%)
Providers:0