+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct leads with 21.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the 24B base model, designed to follow user instructions reliably. Built to serve general-purpose applications requiring moderate capability, it balances performance with deployment practicality.
4 months newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:43.9%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Average Score:65.5%(+21.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:43.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Avg Score:65.5%(+21.5%)
Providers:2