+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct leads with 21.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
3 months newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:49.7%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:71.3%(+21.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:49.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:71.3%(+21.6%)
Providers:0