+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 leads with 54.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 77.0% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.8%), IFEval (90.3%), AIME 2025 (72.1%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
NVIDIA
2025-08-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:14.9%
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Average Score:69.1%(+54.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
2024-09
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:14.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Avg Score:69.1%(+54.2%)
Providers:0