+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-mini leads with 28.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. o1-mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini was created as a faster, more cost-effective reasoning model, designed to bring extended thinking capabilities to applications with tighter latency and budget constraints. Built to excel particularly in coding and STEM reasoning while maintaining affordability, it provides a more accessible entry point to reasoning-enhanced AI assistance.
9 months newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:50.5%
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:79.2%(+28.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:50.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:79.2%(+28.7%)
Providers:2