+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs o1-pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-pro leads with 54.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, o1-pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-pro was developed as an enhanced version of the o1 reasoning model, designed to provide extended reasoning capabilities with greater depth and reliability. Built for professionals and advanced users tackling complex analytical tasks, it offers enhanced thinking time and reasoning quality for the most demanding applications.
6 months newer
o1-pro
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:24.8%
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Average Score:79.0%(+54.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o1-pro
2023-09-30
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:24.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Avg Score:79.0%(+54.2%)
Providers:0