+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs o3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 69.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 represents the next generation in OpenAI's reasoning model series, developed to advance the capabilities of deliberate, step-by-step problem solving. Built to handle increasingly complex challenges across mathematics, science, and coding, it continues the evolution of reasoning-focused AI with improved analytical depth and accuracy.
2 months newer
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:15.8%
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:84.9%(+69.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o3
1 providers
OpenAI
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:15.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:84.9%(+69.1%)
Providers:1