+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs o3-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3-mini leads with 39.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. o3-mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, o3-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3-mini was created as an efficient variant of the o3 reasoning model, designed to provide advanced thinking capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make next-generation reasoning accessible to a broader range of applications, it balances analytical depth with practical speed and cost considerations.
4 months newer
o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:46.0%
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Average Score:85.4%(+39.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3-mini
2023-09-30
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:46.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Avg Score:85.4%(+39.4%)
Providers:2