+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs o4-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o4-mini leads with 71.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, o4-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o4-mini was created as part of the next generation of OpenAI's reasoning models, designed to continue advancing the balance between analytical capability and operational efficiency. Built to bring cutting-edge reasoning techniques to applications requiring quick turnaround, it represents the evolution of compact reasoning-focused models.
2 months newer
o4-mini
OpenAI
2025-04-16
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:15.8%
+
+
+
+
o4-mini
Average Score:87.1%(+71.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o4-mini
2024-05-31
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o4-mini
1 providers
OpenAI
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:15.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o4-mini
Avg Score:87.1%(+71.3%)
Providers:1