+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini leads with 7.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini was created as an even more compact variant of Phi-4, designed to bring fourth-generation capabilities to the smallest possible footprint. Built for extreme efficiency scenarios, it enables AI capabilities on devices and applications where resources are severely constrained.
4 months newer
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:44.6%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:52.3%(+7.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:44.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:52.3%(+7.7%)
Providers:0