+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads with 47.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Reasoning Plus was created as an enhanced reasoning variant, designed to provide even deeper analytical capabilities within the Phi-4 family. Built to maximize reasoning quality while maintaining the efficiency benefits of small models, it represents the most capable reasoning-focused option in the Phi-4 series.
1 month newer
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:21.3%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Average Score:69.0%(+47.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
2025-03-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:21.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Avg Score:69.0%(+47.7%)
Providers:0