+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads with 16.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
9 months newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:40.3%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Average Score:57.1%(+16.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
1 providers
Together
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:40.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Avg Score:57.1%(+16.8%)
Providers:1