+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview leads with 6.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B was created as a specialized efficient variant, designed for deployment in edge and mobile environments with strict resource constraints. Built with optimizations for edge computing, it brings Gemma capabilities to devices and applications where traditional models would be impractical.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
1 month newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
Gemma 3n E2B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Average Score:58.6%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:64.6%(+6.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B
2024-06-01
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Avg Score:58.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:64.6%(+6.0%)
Providers:0