+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B vs Kimi K2 Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Base leads with 24.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B was created as a specialized efficient variant, designed for deployment in edge and mobile environments with strict resource constraints. Built with optimizations for edge computing, it brings Gemma capabilities to devices and applications where traditional models would be impractical.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base was created as the foundation model in the K2 series, designed to serve as a starting point for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide strong base capabilities for domain-specific applications, it enables developers to build specialized solutions on Moonshot's architecture.
15 days newer
Gemma 3n E2B
2025-06-26
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Average Score:60.8%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:85.1%(+24.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Avg Score:60.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:85.1%(+24.3%)
Providers:0