+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 12.0% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 11 benchmarks. Notable strengths include PIQA (78.9%), BoolQ (76.4%), ARC-E (75.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.8% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (92.3%), ChartQA (90.0%). With a 2.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 7 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
Gemma 3n E2B
2025-06-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 24 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Average Score:26.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:38.9%(+12.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
7 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Avg Score:26.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:38.9%(+12.0%)
Providers:7