+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout leads with 7.1% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 11 benchmarks. Notable strengths include PIQA (78.9%), BoolQ (76.4%), ARC-E (75.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.3% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (90.6%), ChartQA (88.8%). With a 20.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Gemma 3n E2B
2025-06-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Average Score:28.0%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:35.1%(+7.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
6 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Avg Score:28.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:35.1%(+7.1%)
Providers:6