+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral NeMo Instruct leads with 12.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B supports multimodal inputs. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Mistral NeMo Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B was created as a specialized efficient variant, designed for deployment in edge and mobile environments with strict resource constraints. Built with optimizations for edge computing, it brings Gemma capabilities to devices and applications where traditional models would be impractical.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
11 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Gemma 3n E2B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Average Score:53.8%
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:66.3%(+12.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Avg Score:53.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:66.3%(+12.5%)
Providers:2