+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Base leads with 29.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Mistral Small 3 24B Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B was created as a specialized efficient variant, designed for deployment in edge and mobile environments with strict resource constraints. Built with optimizations for edge computing, it brings Gemma capabilities to devices and applications where traditional models would be impractical.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Base was developed as a 24-billion-parameter foundation model, designed to serve as a base for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide a strong starting point for domain-specific applications, it represents an intermediate-scale option in Mistral's model lineup.
4 months newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
Gemma 3n E2B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Average Score:56.3%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Average Score:85.8%(+29.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
2023-10-01
Gemma 3n E2B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Avg Score:56.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Avg Score:85.8%(+29.6%)
Providers:0