+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base leads with 19.7% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B was created as a specialized efficient variant, designed for deployment in edge and mobile environments with strict resource constraints. Built with optimizations for edge computing, it brings Gemma capabilities to devices and applications where traditional models would be impractical.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base represents an updated iteration of the 24B foundation model, developed with architectural refinements and improved training. Built to provide enhanced base capabilities for fine-tuning, it incorporates learnings from previous versions for better downstream performance.
3 months newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Gemma 3n E2B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Average Score:60.8%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Average Score:80.5%(+19.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
1 providers
Mistral AI
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Avg Score:60.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Avg Score:80.5%(+19.7%)
Providers:1