+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E2B leads with 3.6% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 11 benchmarks. Notable strengths include PIQA (78.9%), BoolQ (76.4%), ARC-E (75.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.4%), MMLU (80.6%), TriviaQA (80.5%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Gemma 3n E2B
2025-06-26
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Average Score:34.0%(+3.6%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:30.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Avg Score:34.0%(+3.6%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:30.3%
Providers:0