+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 23.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B supports multimodal inputs. o1 is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 11 benchmarks. Notable strengths include PIQA (78.9%), BoolQ (76.4%), ARC-E (75.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Gemma 3n E2B
2025-06-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 30 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Average Score:21.5%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:45.3%(+23.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o1
2 providers
Azure
Throughput:
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Avg Score:21.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:45.3%(+23.8%)
Providers:2