+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E2B vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini leads with 11.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B was created as a specialized efficient variant, designed for deployment in edge and mobile environments with strict resource constraints. Built with optimizations for edge computing, it brings Gemma capabilities to devices and applications where traditional models would be impractical.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini was created as an even more compact variant of Phi-4, designed to bring fourth-generation capabilities to the smallest possible footprint. Built for extreme efficiency scenarios, it enables AI capabilities on devices and applications where resources are severely constrained.
4 months newer
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
Gemma 3n E2B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Average Score:62.7%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:74.5%(+11.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B
2024-06-01
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Avg Score:62.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:74.5%(+11.8%)
Providers:0