+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo leads with 2.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs. GPT-3.5 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
2 years newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:57.0%
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:59.0%(+2.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:57.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:59.0%(+2.0%)
Providers:2